Jump to content

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 12 2025

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Camaleón_africano_delgado_(Chamaeleo_dilepis),_parque_nacional_de_la_Bahía_Jozani_Chwaka,_Zanzíbar,_Tanzania,_2024-06-02,_DD_32.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 09:00, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Eye is blurry and not in focus, light areas are blown out --Горбунова М.С. 19:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:55, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO sufficiently sharp for the high resolution, but lighting is too harsh with several very disturbing strongly overexposed parts. Sorry --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:01, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per robert. --Smial 14:36, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Корпус_Михайловского_театра_по_каналу_Грибоедова_4_лето_2024_01.png

[edit]

  • Nomination Mikhaylovsky Theatre building (by Никонико962) --FBilula 13:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strongly oversaturated + perspective issues. --Florstein 08:19, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective correction is needed and overprocessed, CAs, oversaturated colors, compression artifacts ?... --Sebring12Hrs 10:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Florstein --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:03, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't see any serious perspective issues here, but I looked at the image more carefully and found it not sharp enough and, yes, oversaturated, so I removed my supporting vote. -- Екатерина Борисова 14:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:32, 11 March 2025 (UTC)